Skip to main content
Open In Colab

The Problem

Reviewing a growing rights-controlled catalog for visually similar reuse candidates does not scale with manual checks alone. This guide shows how to screen suspect videos with semantic retrieval and prepare timestamped side-by-side clips for human review. Similarity is a triage signal; it does not establish copying, ownership, licensing status, infringement, or grounds for an automated takedown.

What You’ll Build

Build a review workflow that:
  • Indexes rights-controlled portfolio videos as searchable visual descriptions
  • Screens suspect-video scenes for visually similar candidates
  • Generates separate side-by-side comparison clips for human review
  • Groups temporally adjacent candidates as review context
  • Creates reports with retrieval relevance scores
All powered by VideoDB’s Editor SDK and semantic search.

Setup

Install Dependencies

Connect to VideoDB

Implementation

Step 1: Index Your Portfolio Videos

Step 2: Upload Suspect Video for Analysis

Step 3: Perform Similarity Comparison

Step 4: Group Sequential Review Candidates

Step 5: Generate Side-by-Side Review Clips

Step 6: Generate a Review Report

What You Get

A review workflow with:
  • Scene-by-scene visual descriptions for rights-controlled reference videos
  • Semantic similarity candidates for human review
  • Monotonic, bounded-gap candidate groups for temporal context
  • Separate side-by-side comparison clips
  • Retrieval relevance scores and an explicit human-review note
Here is an example side-by-side review clip:

How It Works

  1. Portfolio Indexing - Convert rights-controlled reference videos into searchable scene descriptions
  2. Suspect Upload - Upload a video for screening
  3. Similarity Scan - Retrieve visually similar candidates for review
  4. Sequential Detection - Group monotonic candidates with bounded timestamp gaps
  5. Review Clip Generation - Create side-by-side comparison clips
  6. Human Review - Assess ownership, licensing, and legal questions outside this workflow

Similarity Thresholds

  • 0.70+ = Candidate included for review
  • Below 0.70 = Excluded by this example’s relevance cutoff
Tune the cutoff for review workload and false positives; semantic relevance does not determine copying or infringement.

The Result

With this system, you can:
  • Screen candidate videos against a rights-controlled portfolio
  • Review timestamped, visually similar moments
  • Generate side-by-side review clips for investigators
  • Prioritize human review with transparent relevance scores
Use the results as AI-assisted screening, not as a legal conclusion or automated enforcement decision.

Explore the Full Notebook

Open the complete AI-assisted review workflow with batch processing and portfolio management.

Profanity Beeper

Auto-detect and beep curse words in audio

Content Removal

Skip inappropriate visual content in streams