Skip to main content
Your agent can summarize a 50-page document in seconds. It can write code, answer questions, and reason through complex problems. But show it a 30-minute meeting recording and ask “what did the client say about the budget?” - and it fails.

​
The Text-First Assumption

Modern AI agents are built on a text-first assumption. LLMs process text. RAG retrieves text. Tool calls return text. The entire agent architecture assumes the world is made of strings. But the world isn’t text.
  • Your customer calls are audio
  • Your security feeds are video
  • Your user sessions are screen recordings
  • Your meetings are multimodal streams
When agents encounter these inputs, they either:
  1. Ignore them entirely
  2. Attempt expensive full-video transcoding that doesn’t scale
  3. Hallucinate answers without verifiable grounding
None of these work.

​
The Cost of Blindness

Consider what agents miss when they can’t perceive: In enterprise workflows:
  • Customer sentiment from call recordings
  • Visual context from screen shares
  • Non-verbal cues in video meetings
  • Timeline of events in incident recordings
In monitoring applications:
  • Real-time security events
  • Manufacturing quality issues
  • Traffic and safety violations
  • Drone and sensor footage
In desktop assistants:
  • What the user is looking at
  • Context from system audio
  • Visual state of applications
  • Multi-app workflows
An agent that can’t perceive is an agent that hallucinates. It fills gaps with plausible-sounding fiction because it has no grounding in observable reality.

​
Human Perception vs Agent Perception

Humans perceive continuously. We see and hear in real-time. We remember experiences - not just facts, but temporal sequences with sensory context. When you recall a meeting, you don’t remember a JSON object. You remember the moment - the screen, the voice, the pause before someone made a point. Agents today have no equivalent. They have:
  • Text-based memory (vector stores of embeddings)
  • Text-based retrieval (semantic search over documents)
  • Text-based reasoning (LLM inference over strings)
What they lack is perception - the ability to continuously take in video and audio, extract meaning in real-time, and ground responses in observable evidence.

​
The Perception Gap

Here’s the gap:
CapabilityHumanToday’s Agent
Continuous perceptionYesNo
Real-time video/audioYesNo
Episodic memoryYesNo
Evidence-grounded answersYesPartial
Multimodal contextYesLimited
This isn’t a minor limitation. It’s a fundamental architectural gap.

​
What Perception Enables

When agents can perceive:
  1. Grounded answers - Every response can link to a playable moment
  2. Real-time awareness - React to events as they happen, not after the fact
  3. Episodic recall - “Remember the part where…” becomes answerable
  4. Multimodal reasoning - Combine what was said with what was shown
  5. Continuous context - Maintain awareness across sessions
The future of agents isn’t just better reasoning. It’s perception - the ability to see, hear, and remember.

​
What’s Next

Perception Is the Missing Layer

The architecture that gives agents eyes and ears

Quickstart

Try perception-enabled agents